Search for: "In Re Robert" Results 5101 - 5120 of 15,480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court of Florida.Family law forms -- Amendments -- Name change petitions
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:26 pm by Rory Little
” But Roberts re-entered the discussion and read the “question presented” in Eisenhammer’s brief back to him: “I was confused. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:00 am by Barbara Moreno
  Joe Kenda is the person you want on your case if you’re a victim but not if he’s investigating a crime you’ve committed! [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm by Amy Howe
Could an insider be held liable, Roberts asked, if he disclosed confidential information to his friends in the course of explaining why he couldn’t accompany them on a proposed weekend trip? [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am by Rory Little
” (When Roberts later said “I guess everybody agrees it’s the defendant’s burden,” no justice suggested otherwise.) [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Reuters] * According to Chief Justice John Roberts, "judges are not politicians, even when they come to the bench by way of the ballot," but that doesn't mean elected judges behave as judicially as they're expected to when retention elections are near. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
Following the announcement of the super-couple’s divorce, Angelina Jolie’s entertainment attorney Robert Offer revealed that she had made her decision to file for divorce “for the health of the family. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the term will begin “with the focus not on the court’s docket but on the court itself and a future that will be defined by the presidential election. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:17 am by Walter Olson
Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman: yes, the confirmation process had gone wrong, but not necessarily in the way we’re told [National Affairs] A case against judicial restraint [Ilya Shapiro, same, related Cato] “Business and the Roberts Court without Scalia” [Jonathan Adler, related on supposed “pro-business” Court] SCOTUS should (again) step in to reject Obama end-run around advice/consent on appointment power [Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry,… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:20 pm by David Post
And I have a second question: What makes you think that you’re not being scammed? [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:10 am by Angel Reyes III
We’re not going to use it,’” said Robert Taylor, Autoliv’s head chemist until 2010. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:15 am by Orin Kerr
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has handed down a new case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
However, Binchy J declined to grant injunctions requiring Facebook either to remove allegedly defamatory posts from the account or to prevent the material in them from being re-posted, on the grounds that Facebook could rely on the defence of innocent publication in section 27 of the 2009 Act and on the hosting immunity conferred by Regulation 18 of the European Communities (Directive 2000/31/EC) Regulations 2003 (SI No 68 of 2003) (transposing Article 14 of the e-Commerce… [read post]