Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 5101 - 5120 of 15,541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2022, 9:11 pm by Jennifer Huddleston
This year, one such low-profile case is Axon Enterprise v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm by admin
In December 2010, the Supreme Court faced a similar issue in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:06 pm by Larry Downes
I’m late to the party, but I wanted to say a few things about the District Court’s decision in the Viacom v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” The bar for originality is low; it requires only a “modicum of creativity. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Copyright Act provides that copyright protection exists in all “original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression ”It is well established that labels are subject to copyright protection, if the label manifests the necessary modicum of creativity.”7 The statute lists several categories of works which may be protected, including “(1) literary works; (2) musical works, including any accompanying words; (3) dramatic… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
Amanda Becker of the Washington Post writes on the implications for attorneys’ ability to collect fees from low-income clients in cases against the government in the wake of last week’s decision in Astrue v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:28 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court released a landmark judgment yesterday in the closely watched case, Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
’ eBay also purchased advertising space on search engines, in some instances providing a link to eBay’s site and exhorting the reader to ‘Find tiffany items at low prices. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm by Jonathan Brun
Now because the plaintiffs, at least according to the court, didn’t offer any evidence on health, the court took the ministry’s word and the ministry’s official position was that 8000 was a low enough benchmark to protect human health, even though for the rest of the province, the number is 200. [read post]