Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 8,375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2021, 8:15 am
The case, which directly challenges Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:41 pm
A convicted criminal shown below just lost in the Ninth.United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
As expounded by the George W. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:52 pm
With $3.3 million in alleged damages against a Chapter 7 debtor at stake, in Ackerman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:52 pm
With $3.3 million in alleged damages against a Chapter 7 debtor at stake, in Ackerman v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:45 am
Ladore v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
Stryker, No. 11-0041-CV-W-ODS, 2013 U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, in which the Court of Appeals held that, "[w]hen indicting for statutory crimes, it is usually sufficient to charge the language of the statute unless that language is too broad," the Appellate Division opined that "by requiring [Corrections] to prove the underlying crime in the notice to support [applying] the CBA's time exception," the arbitrator essentially added a term to the CBA and, thus, exceeded his… [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:40 pm
I remember her as a witness who came across as trustworthy, knowledgeable, and fairly balanced in the FTC v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
History plays a role: SCt has gone back to historical sources for patent law, e.g., Impressions v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:02 am
An example is the authors’ discussion of U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
The recently decided Appellate Division matter of Scianni v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:36 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
” Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:02 am
The Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Ziglar v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:11 am
Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Lee that “[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where "[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer's religious faith on the employees." [read post]
