Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 5101 - 5120 of 13,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Plaintiff further claimed that the use of prior salary alone can’t be considered a “factor other than sex” because it perpetuates existing pay disparities and further undermines the purpose of the Equal Pay Act. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:23 am by INFORRM
It doesn’t attempt to analyze the scope of Member State authority, beyond noting where the GDPR states that some authority exists. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am by Jamie Baker
Levine, Place Matters in Prosecution Research, 14 OHIO ST. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:17 am by Doug Cornelius
[Gearhart & Otis, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 7329, 1964 SEC LEXIS 513, at *59 (June 2, 1964), aff’d on other grounds, 348 F.2d 798 (D.C. [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  Like civil or criminal procedural rules in a court, these matter a lot. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:32 pm by John Lewis
Siegel Trading Co. 55 F.3d 269, 275 (7th Cir. 1995) (declaring “the FAA forbids federal judges from ordering class arbitration where the parties’ arbitration agreement is silent on the matter”). [read post]
  The court held that, “[b]y consenting to join Halle’s collective action, these opt-in plaintiffs ceded to Halle the ability to act on their behalf in all matters, including the ability to pursue this appeal. [read post]
  The court held that, “[b]y consenting to join Halle’s collective action, these opt-in plaintiffs ceded to Halle the ability to act on their behalf in all matters, including the ability to pursue this appeal. [read post]
  The court held that, “[b]y consenting to join Halle’s collective action, these opt-in plaintiffs ceded to Halle the ability to act on their behalf in all matters, including the ability to pursue this appeal. [read post]
1 May 2017, 2:57 pm by Daphne Keller
It doesn’t attempt to analyze the scope of Member State authority, beyond noting where the GDPR states that some authority exists. [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:41 am by Ron Coleman
And while it would have been error enough if the parties had merely relied on Premier Dental in the briefing, the district court evidently made matters worse. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Venkat Balasubramani
One test considers: (1) the place of the discussion; (2) the subject matter; (3) the nature of the outburst; and (4) whether the outburst was provoked by the employer’s unfair labor practice. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
Specifically, the constitutional validity of sections 3 and 4 of the 1946 ordinance was challenged alleging that these provisions were in violation of article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution. [read post]