Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 5101 - 5120 of 10,419
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2016, 6:43 am by familoo
Fortunately the mistake was remedied swiftly – although only because lawyers unconnected to the case who happened to notice its weekend publication and the obvious gravity took steps to track down the publisher meaning it was only live for perhaps 24 hours – but the potential for harm and distress is clear. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 8:48 am by Matthew Lau
This uncertainty is exacerbated by the high stakes involved, as Brexit would mark a major change from the status quo. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 3:35 pm by Aaron Mackey
Congress has passed reforms to the Freedom of Information Act, which EFF hopes signals the beginning of a larger overhaul of the transparency law that will mark its 50th birthday in July. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
| AIPPI event on EU trade mark reform | Ex Deep Purple member registers band name as trade mark | Copyright in the telephone directory [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ability to mislead or create harmful effects w/truth is pretty high. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Indeed, the outsized risks associated with entire-profit awards could be even more harmful when asserted in disputes between product-producing competitors. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 9:21 am by Andrew Delaney
In the dissent’s view, the “majority opinion misses the mark both on the facts and the law. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: there’s no good standard even for word marks. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Where he sees a wrong in the failure to balance harm to the public against the irreparability of the harm, I see a threshold that challenges the court to ask whether the public is really being harmed in the first place. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by SHG
” It’s not that there isn’t harm, but your harm is no more special than anyone else’s. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Dinwoodie: what the courts in UK have said about limping marks would invalidate a lot of marks. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s TM policy: ordinary word marks provide information benefits when protected, and there are no harms b/c taking the words doesn’t do any harm. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by Jay
  According to NursingHomeAbuseGuide.org, the following statistics relate to nursing home abuse in the United States: Between 1999 and 2001, nearly one-third of all American nursing homes were cited for violations of federal standards that could have led to harm or did lead to harm of residents. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:59 am by Mark Astarita
  No money has been taken or withheld from harmed investors to pay whistleblower awards. [read post]
Friday, June 3rd, marked the last day for bills to pass out of their house of origin in the California Legislature. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   Functionality has lots of applications where people just want the surface appearance of the mark—the features have consumption value for the product (can be word marks, or design). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
I blogged two weeks ago about a First Amendment challenge to California Penal Code § 9026.5, which makes it a crime to rebroadcast televised California Assembly proceedings “for any political or commercial purpose, including, but not limited to, any campaign for elective public office or any campaign supporting or opposing a ballot proposition submitted to the electors. [read post]