Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5101 - 5120
of 21,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2019, 9:01 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
Also online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has jurisprudence essays titled “Supreme Court, in 5–4 Decision, Allows States to Purge Voters for Their Failure to Vote” and “The Supreme Court’s Decision Greenlighting Voter Purges Is a Big Win for the Trump Administration. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 6:50 am
That's what Chief Justice Rehnquist did in Locke v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am
However, these allegations are “utterly refute[d]” by the documentary evidence, which defined the scope of the parties’ engagement and confirmed that defendants had no such duty (Chen v Romona Keveza Collection LLC, 208 AD3d 152, 157 [1st Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks omitted]; CPLR 3211 [a] [1]). [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
The Board of Trustees of Vincennes University (NFP) In Re the Adoption of R.B.H.; Mark L. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
“Plaintiff does not allege that any of the products that purportedly contain false advertising use its marks “Planet Green” or “Doorstepink. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Monahan, Mark V. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:32 am
"Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:05 am
” Interestingly, Goldman also stated that “The reason he moved into a gated HOA was so that he could have peace and tranquility. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:52 am
Sarah's Hat Boxes, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:15 am
But today we will conduct a mortality and morbidity meeting on the case of Marcum v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
Commodores Entertainment Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:16 pm
(quoting Glynwed, Inc., supra, 869 F.Supp. at 276)(internal quotation marks omitted)The law firm of LoFaro & Reiser, LLP represents both plaintiffs and defendants in successor liability actions and fraudulent asset transfers in federal and state courts throughout New Jersey. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:45 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark THE EGG for "facial toning machines for cosmetic use" on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 10:03 am
Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
VIP Products LLC leaving open the question of whether the Rogers v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]