Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
And unkind reader of the evolving dispute over the Louboutin red sole trade mark in the United States might be forgiven for saying that murky rules of unclear application are found there too. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am
United States, 16-9649, Richter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Washington: False marking claim defeated at summary judgment – Employee mistakes do not constitute false marking: Bow Jax Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
The United States scarcely resembles the fledgling republic that emerged at the end of the 18th century. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
” Couture v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:56 am
EPE stood its ground, also stating that it had built up significant goodwill in its trade marks and logos to the extent that a substantial body of the public, upon seeing those marks and logos, would believe those goods or services to be those of EPE and its lawful licensees. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:23 pm
I mean, the United States would treat both the same, right? [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Inforrm also had a quick preview of the year ahead, marking its return from a winter break. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
"The federal court's March 31 decision in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
The TDRA establishes that “[a] famous mark is one that ‘is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
Brief of Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
