Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 5101 - 5120 of 22,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Courts considering the meaning of a statement in defamation cases in which the publisher is seeking to use the defence that the publication was on a matter of public interest should adopt a flexible approach, according to the authors of the latest edition of Duncan and Neill on Defamation. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Josh Blackman
This predicate factual question may give the Court an easy out to avoid ruling on the more difficult constitutional question. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 8:07 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Background The matter arose when three retired female RCMP members-including Ms. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm by David S. Kemp and Charles E. Binkley
City of Philadelphia, which presents the question whether a city may exclude a Roman Catholic adoption agency from its foster care system because the agency refuses to work with gay couples, in violation of the City’s nondiscrimination laws. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:34 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Turkey has also adopted a data protection law; however, it has failed to protect fundamental rights in practice. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Ruth Levush
The Conseil d’Etat adopted a similar approach in a 1989 decision, although it limited its authority to overturning legislation that was adopted prior to the international treaty, and not after (the Cour de cassation found that it could overturn laws adopted both before and after a treaty). [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:24 am by Matthias Weller
 11 of August 2000 (available here), pp 19-128   Bibliography Beaumont, Paul “Forum non Conveniens and the EU rules on Conflicts of Jurisdiction: A Possible Global Solution”, Revue Critique de Droit International Privé 2018, pp 433-447 Beaumont, Paul R. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  This delegation of the Commonwealth agency’s family-approval function is not simply a matter of Pennsylvania abdicating its responsibility to perform its own duty by turning it over to private parties to do what they wish. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
He argued that adopting Harris’ logic would thus permit judicial review even of mere “rehashes. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:59 am by David Oxenford
  That would seem to make sense as all of these rules were adopted so that candidates can persuade voters to vote for them. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:20 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
For example, in New Jersey, our courts have held that a single racial epithet can constitute a hostile work environment, while other courts outside New Jersey have adopted a strict rule that a single racial epithet, no matter how offensive, can never be enough to constitute a hostile work environment. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by bhorton
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The racism, the corruption, the casual cruelty, the undermining of the rule of law, and all the rest. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm by Supreme People's Court Monitor
In a blogpost last year, I mentioned that the SPC  has/will require local courts to report guiding rules applicable within their jurisdictions to the SPC. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Nor does it matter that the injury comes from a third party (here, Baker), so long as the third party's conduct is foreseeable. [read post]