Search for: "People v David S."
Results 5101 - 5120
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2009, 3:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:25 pm
Justice Scalia's comments came in the 2006 Supreme Court ruling Kansas v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
David L. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the Women’s Sports Foundation (WSF) all have their own definition of “sport” that a competitive cheerleading squad could possibly qualify under.[6] The question also brings up other issues that would need to be addressed. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
Circuit’s decision last Friday in Emily’s List v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:18 am
Supreme Court, in McIntyre v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:06 pm
V. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
The case is Kilker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
View the article here 09/18/2009 By DAVID DELCORE BARRE - Mayor Thomas Lauzon says he's ready to abandon an ordinance designed to regulate where convicted sex offenders can and can't live in the Granite City. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Centerville, MA; David Murphy, President) A La Carte Gardens, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:51 pm
” Neither the statute nor the Supreme Court have defined the term or who may invoke it, but in NBC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:02 am
The Mississippi case is Seale v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:32 pm
As Arnell spoke with Waldron, a passenger in the motor home, David Burgess, joined the conversation. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
“Allowing judges to make the determination has been a failure,” said David S. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:58 am
In a Harvard Law Review article based on the Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
"Then there's the anti-hippie ordinance (which prohibited people from sitting in a park at Carmel-by-the-Sea), which the California Supreme Court struck down in 1971 in Parr v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
I am sure that many of them are nice people. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
In 1990, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
