Search for: "People v Johns" Results 5101 - 5120 of 9,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
(Henry Knox and John Jay also sent Washington their ideas.) [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Arguably when judges use their position to solicit contributions they misuse the judicial office and may cause people to feel intimidated or coerced into donating.[118] Judges might take advantage of the prestige of their office to solicit money for an organization, and this may occur even in circumstances where such conduct cannot be described as involving intimidation.[119] The prestige of the judicial office is not intended to be used as a vehicle to advance economic, financial, social,… [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
There is an implicit message in this lawyerly turn from the People to the Court: popular sovereignty is dead in modern America.As John McGinnis suggests, identifying successful constitutional moments requires a lot more work than determining the presence or absence of an Article Five amendment. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
” After nearly a year, Senior Judge Paul John McCormick for the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:59 pm by Kevin
Looks like we have a new record for Largest Known Demand: Anton Purisma v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:31 pm
Last month, she filed a lawsuit in Cook County Circuit Court against John H. [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:59 pm
Complying with the Supreme Court's dictates in Brady v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
The French draft is worded carefully to avoid potentially implicating Israel or American service people, and John uses it as a case-study to comment on how the US can make productive use of the ICC without submitting to its jurisdiction. [read post]