Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 12,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:38 am
There are very good reasons to worry that someone in this situation may be more tempted than usual to cross the line into dishonest or unethical behavior, and good reasons to worry that other people in the company are going to lose faith in her abilities and her judgment. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
The appeal (Mathena v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:59 am
The later decision, Virginia v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:59 am
Mr Rob Edwards v IC EA/2010/0056. [read post]
26 May 2007, 8:18 am
People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:19 pm
" US v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The leading case to address whether ‘cohabitation’ requires two people living under the same roof is Stephen v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:29 am
The Third Circuit lined up the issue . . . wait a second . . . it's a punt! [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Runyon (Necessary Party; Fishing Rights)Frank’s Landing Indian Community v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:30 am
Phelps in 2011, United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
He drafted that line, too.) [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Conshor, Inc., 832 So. 2d 166, 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
The bottom line: The jury got it wrong. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
