Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 5101 - 5120 of 123,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2015, 4:30 am
The statement is made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually asserted. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:40 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  She explained:  "In our culture, the Tembu culture, that I know, the African culture that I know you never release the person unless the person has told you please my children, my family release me. . . . [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In his view, a person who carries out a violent and non-consensual penetration of the vagina, would in substance rightly be described as a rapist, and a reasonable person would regard such an act to be essentially akin to rape. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:54 pm
Parenthetically, this decision in no way constitutes an evidentiary ruling in the event that the Noseworthy doctrine (Noseworthy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:45 pm by Ettinger Law Firm
This is true even though the person may claim that he or she has no entitlement to retain the funds. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:40 am
Religion trumps reason and science and a cult personality rules without democracy. [read post]