Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
; Commercial success as criterion of inventive step: Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & co. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
; Commercial success as criterion of inventive step: Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & co. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm
” (Burchard v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
CRIMES AND OFFENSES - ELEMENTS State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
Estis, a founding partner at Rosenberg & Estis, and Jeffrey Turkel, a partner at the firm, write that with its Oct. 22, 2009 decision in Roberts v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:42 pm
See Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
His scholarly writings on the subject have been cited in numerous cases including, in New York, Horning v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Id.; see also id. at 312 (UCL "fraudulent" prong claim requires proof only that "members of the public are likely to be deceived"); Morgan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 10:59 am
” Hanchett Paper Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:15 pm
To my mind, for a public service agency to take the tenants' side in this case is wrong-headed. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
" People tend to forget that Bayer AG first invented aspirin in 1897 but lost its rights to the brand name in the United States by allowing it to escape into the public domain, i.e., go generic or commit "genericide," a tragic commercial fate shared famously by Duncan Yo-Yo Co. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
The case follows another recent related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
