Search for: "State v. Harris"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 5,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
Both sides in the NJ voting-machines lawsuit, Gusciora v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:04 am
Here's a link to my summary of the underlying case.PD-0319-09, Eric Charles Hobbs v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:03 am
The CCA granted the Smith's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this indecent exposure case out of Harris County on the following issues:The First Court of Appeals erred by finding that the Information alleged with reasonable certainty, the acts relied upon to constitute recklessness.Joseph Smith was charged with indecent exposure for "recklessly" masturbating in front of an undercover officer at Houston's Memorial Park. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:01 am
The court distinguished Ballew v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:08 pm
She then clerked for Supreme Court Justice Harry A. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:46 pm
Constitution, and the states are prohibited from the same by clause 1 of section 10. [read post]
16 May 2009, 12:42 pm
Texas Apr. 15, 2009) and Morrison v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:29 pm
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE People v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:01 am
As in Smith v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:57 pm
See United States of America v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:29 am
Department of Correction v. the N.C. [read post]
9 May 2009, 8:59 pm
" State v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
Subject to the Front Comor argument which I consider later in this judgment, the Court of Appeal’s decision in C v D is to be taken as correctly stating the law. [read post]
8 May 2009, 3:49 am
A few weeks back, I mentioned the 8th District’s decision in the case of State v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:45 am
(citations without quotes omitted) Harris v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:30 pm
Amistad - Former Justice Harry Blackmun played the role of Justice Joseph Story in this fictionalized account of the real case, wherein the Court upheld the liberation of native Africans who had been kidnapped and brought to the United States after the importation of slaves had been prohibited. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:09 am
But by granting this right, the state never purported to guarantee that there would be available and willing providers.Perhaps the most famous case illustrating the gap between liberty rights and actual access is Harris v. [read post]
