Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 45,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
These cases are reviewed below: People v Newton, 2007 NY Slip Op 03754 - "No Means No" The defendant was charged with, inter alia, sodomy in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40[3]). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
To bypass the highly relevant Herbert v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:10 am
In Hodes & Nauser MDs PA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:44 am
State, held the same under the Second Amendment, and People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm
” – Chief Justice Roberts Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
” That’s right, the Supreme Court decided the winner of a popular presidential election, and one of the architects of that decision wants people to not care about it anymore. [read post]
9 May 2009, 1:10 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:21 am
" Callahan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 5:49 am
How does the Supreme Court’s ruling in Olmstead v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and AR NAACP v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
On August 11, 2014, the Court of Appeal in People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:48 am
People v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:29 am
(See also Whren v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm
The law acutely harms the state’s most vulnerable people, its economy, and its reputation. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
Further, the United States argued that Texas, not being harmed by DAPA, lacked standing under the constitution to even bring the suit to federal court.Texas, on behalf of itself and many other states that joined the suit, asserted that it would suffer significant administrative costs [i.e. providing drivers licenses and other government services] devoted to a group of people who are in the country illegally.Chief Justice John Roberts, active during the extended oral… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
WILLIAMS - Leagle.com PEOPLE v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
