Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 29,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La. 7/1/08), 998 So. 2d 16, and State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm
In Medicaid planning we must often take the good with the bad. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:51 pm
-->-->*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->BY MARC BOURGEOISTestimony in day four of Sony v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
But that was before the Supreme Court decided Walker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:35 pm
In Clemons v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:09 am
’ State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 4:01 pm
I can't plan everything, of course. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:13 am
This case–Bell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Hood v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:34 am
Recently, Denmark claimed Michael Ben-Jacob, an Arnold & Porter partner, designed a scheme that defrauded the country of around $260 million.[1] The scheme involved setting up sham pension plans to apply for refunds in Denmark and the complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.).[2] Denmark’s customs and tax authority (SKAT) stated that the plans submitted at least 364 fraudulent applications involving 630 dividends issued by 13… [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:34 am
Recently, Denmark claimed Michael Ben-Jacob, an Arnold & Porter partner, designed a scheme that defrauded the country of around $260 million.[1] The scheme involved setting up sham pension plans to apply for refunds in Denmark and the complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.).[2] Denmark’s customs and tax authority (SKAT) stated that the plans submitted at least 364 fraudulent applications involving 630 dividends issued by 13… [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:30 am
The lower court made a further order for a parenting plan, again, with no hearing whatsoever. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
The state argued, among other things, that the Supreme Court's decision earlier this year in Douglas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:43 pm
The Minnesota Supreme Court is currently considering this argument in a case called State v. [read post]
