Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 36,793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
What we have is a police state trying to control the population by discovering and then reeducating (or eradicating) those who think in ways contrary to the wishes of the controlling and powerful few. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:15 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland, TV Vest v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 7:53 pm
Here is the abstract: In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm
Oral arguments in American Electric Power v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:38 am
" <> Electric Power Supply Assoc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
The court’s interpretation of the statute of limitations as applied to the PSD program is consistent with a 2011 district court decision in the 3rd Circuit, United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:43 am
Flood’s ill-fated challenge to the infamous reserve clause landed him before the United States Supreme Court in 1972. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935, said that a… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935, said that a… [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:05 am
The 89-page complaint (full text) in Preserve Hudson Valley v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
The case, Secretary of State for the Home Department v David Davis MP and others [2015] EWCA Civ 1185, has recently been referred by the Court of Appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union where the court asks the CJEU to rule on whether the ground-breaking case of Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources & Others, the case which ruled that European data retention laws were incompatible with Articles 7 & 8 of… [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm
Following up on our recent blog post regarding the Seventh Circuit’s decision to uphold Illinois’ nuclear subsidy program, two weeks later on September 27, 2018, the Second Circuit upheld a district court’s decision finding that New York’s nuclear subsidy program was not preempted by the Federal Power Act (Coalition for Competitive Electricity, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm
Following up on our recent blog post regarding the Seventh Circuit’s decision to uphold Illinois’ nuclear subsidy program, two weeks later on September 27, 2018, the Second Circuit upheld a district court’s decision finding that New York’s nuclear subsidy program was not preempted by the Federal Power Act (Coalition for Competitive Electricity, et al. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
Under Title V, states with program approval--which EPA gives and takes away--issue permits to power plants and factories on their own, rather than directly through EPA. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
§157, stated that Stern v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 4:30 pm
This absurd decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
