Search for: "State v. Price" Results 5101 - 5120 of 11,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2009, 8:34 am
Indeed, the new AAG for Antitrust has stated her pessimism regarding the existence of type I errors in antitrust. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
” Again over objections, Price answered no. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:32 pm by Lorene Park
She also pointed to the legal context prevailing at the time the ADA was enacted, including the Supreme Court’s decision in Price Waterhouse v Hopkins, wherein the High Court determined that the “because of” language in Title VII meant that the plaintiff had to prove gender played a “motivating part” in the employment decision. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm by John Chierichella and Adam Bartolanzo
The statute expressly stated that submission of cost or pricing data shall not be required. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 11:10 am by John Chierichella and Adam Bartolanzo
The statute expressly stated that submission of cost or pricing data shall not be required. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:38 pm by John Chierichella and Adam Bartolanzo
The statute expressly stated that submission of cost or pricing data shall not be required. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 11:10 am by John Chierichella and Adam Bartolanzo
The statute expressly stated that submission of cost or pricing data shall not be required. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]