Search for: "State v. True"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 21,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 12:29 pm
LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm
Good faith can be accepted when a whistle-blower believed that the disclosed information was true and that it was in the public interest to disclose it. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
Tambry and Suzanne were the lead plaintiffs in our case, Young v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Compagnie Gervais Danone v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Google is no longer seen as a hero, especially outside the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:24 am
Both may be true, but who wins in the heartbreak sweepstakes? [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
It has been true, since at least 1925 (the Supreme Court decision in Carroll v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am
“With regard to the first cause of action, Izmirligil failed to state a cause of action under Real Property Law § 329 against the BNYM defendants and Chase (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:19 am
The answer appears to be yes as to booksellers, see Spence v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:46 am
Souratgar v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:45 am
When determining a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), "the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action," and "the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory'" (Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181, quoting Leon v Martinez,… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
” [Michael Kinsley on McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:52 pm
In that regard the newspaper pleaded that the article meant something other than what the plaintiffs alleged and that, in that sense, it was true. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
For doing what you have a critical federal (as well as state) constitutional right to do? [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Ruling unanimously in Densmaa v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:35 am
Omnicare argued that the Supreme Court’s 1991 decision in Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. [read post]
