Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 5101 - 5120 of 19,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm by Lyle Denniston
  However, the Justices refused to do so on Nov. 8 in Baldwin, et al., v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm by Orin Kerr
I suspect the Justices will think the rights of Jeff Quon are easily resolved. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:04 am by Jonathan Bailey
Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in the case of Allen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland, (4 October 2024, C-446/21) the Court of Justice for the European Union ruled that social networks cannot use all of the personal data obtained from their users for personalised advertising, without any restrictions as to the time and the type of data. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
   In addition, the appeal court made some general remarks about the scope of the duty to disclose, and expressed the opinion that, if there had been a failure to disclose by the Crown, the appeal would still have been refused since that failure would not, in the circumstances of the case, have led to a miscarriage of justice. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:35 am by Andy Taylor
The concurring opinion, written by Justice Baker, referred back to the court’s opinion in Graham v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
That's the right way to view the statute, and that's the way I'd interpret it.Which is why, in the end, I'm on board for the California Supreme Court's opinion.Mind you, it's still somewhat tough to square that decision with precedent, which has found statutes "specific" (and hence locked in) in a wide variety of settings that look pretty darn similar to the case here. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Perhaps Obama is still mad at Roberts for screwing up the oath and ruining the inauguration? [read post]
Majority Opinion Writing for five of the nine justices, Justice Clarence Thomas focused on the generality of the wording in the underlying ACA provision. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm by Doorey
 January 7 2019 By now, you have no doubt heard about the big Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Heller v. [read post]