Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 5101 - 5120 of 10,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2014, 8:16 am by Garret Murai
In a decision decided last month, the California Court of Appeals for the First District, in Palagin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm by nblaw
Superior Court of Orange County (1992) 9 Cal App.4th 162, and McIndoe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:10 am
LEXIS 5591 (ED CA, Jan. 25, 2008), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of an inmate's claim that "he was denied services to study and follow the life of his Prophet (Muhammad)…" The court said plaintiff failed to link the alleged denial to the conduct of any of the named defendants.In Wesley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am by Alex Lee
However, the agreement said nothing about what forum replaced the right to a jury trial, aside from a passing mention to the fact that the employee would pay the “then-current Superior Court of California filing fee towards the costs of the arbitration. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am by Alex Lee
However, the agreement said nothing about what forum replaced the right to a jury trial, aside from a passing mention to the fact that the employee would pay the “then-current Superior Court of California filing fee towards the costs of the arbitration. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    According to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office, Sheila Burke was remanded to prison by Superior Court Judge Judith Champagne after roughly 20 probation violation hearings dating back to Aug. 26, 2007, when she was sentenced to one year in county jail and 5 years of probation and ordered to pay restitution to APM Terminals. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Zaller
  Unless this order is appealed, it is a binding judgment against the parties, and a certified copy of the order is filed with the superior court and judgment is entered. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm
Two recent California Court of Appeal cases put some teeth in these requirements. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:37 am by NBlack
Superior Court, 2012 WL 1950184, the California Court of Appeal, Third District, a juror was accused of engaging in misconduct by posting to a social network about jury duty during the pendency of the trial. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm by Food Liability Attorney
Irwin Naturals, Inc., Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2011-00445453. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:38 am by Dean I. Weitzman, Esq.
After hearing testimony in the case, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury awarded Rada $3.5 million in economic damages and $18 million in noneconomic damages, totaling $21.5 million. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:53 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
In a very recent California Supreme Court case, the Court held that the “respondeat superior doctrine makes an employer liable, irrespective of fault, for an employee’s tortious conduct in the scope of employment. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 6:24 pm by Bill Marler
CV2013-008589, and Pima County Superior Court Case No. 2:13-CV-001146-MEA California:  San Diego County Superior Court Case No. 37-2013-00051417-CU-PL-CTL, San Diego County Superior Court Case No. 37-2013-00052490-CU-PL-NC, Yolo County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm by Jeff Schmitt
This principle is limited to state courts and thus does not apply to the California legislation. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:42 am by Bruce Nye
(June 3, 2010) ___Cal.App.4th___ Case  (California Court of Appeal No. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:02 pm
Previously, I wrote about the tentative decision issued by Judge Donald Black of Fresno Superior Court in the case involving the withdrawal of the Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:14 am by Jon Sands
The trial court denied the motion after a hearing, and the California Court of Appeal affirmed.The court was "troubled" by the state's argument that the petitioner voluntarily accompanied the detectives to the stationhouse. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
The lawsuit was filed in the California Superior Court by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, (MALDEF) on behalf of former Ivy-employee Reymundo Martinez, who reportedly worked for the restaurant for five months as a busser. [read post]