Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 5101 - 5120 of 5,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm by Eric Goldman
Perhaps…and You Can Help (URGENT CALL TO ACTION) * Congress Probably Will Ruin Section 230 This Week (SESTA/FOSTA Updates) * What’s New With SESTA/FOSTA (January 17, 2018 edition) * New House Bill (Substitute FOSTA) Has More Promising Approach to Regulating Online Sex Trafficking * My testimony at the House Energy & Commerce Committee: Balancing Section 230 and Anti-Sex Trafficking Initiatives * How SESTA Undermines Section 230’s Good Samaritan… [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The saga of Case C 208/09  Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien, in which the court gave its ruling on 22 December, all began in Vienna, Austria, in 1944 where Ilonka was born, instantly becoming an Austrian citizen. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
It’s hard not to feel sorry for the petitioner in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc., Decision and Order, Index No. 160294/2021 [Sup Ct, NY County Apr. 20, 2022]. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am by Darren O'Donovan
Further, in 1993, in McGimpsey case (most extensively discussed by Clive Symmons) the court itself ignored its earlier comments, and waved through the Anglo Irish agreement without constitutional referendum, despite its obligations to participate in cross border bodies. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" You can't cross-examine a database and often the information they contain comes from many different, frequently untraceable sources that may not be correct or complete.In Texas this is a particularly salient issue because many jurisdictions have a bad habit of reporting arrests to the statewide data system but fail to report the outcome of the cases. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:17 am
 The internet was developed by people who clearly knew and loved Adam’s books. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
  One should not expect people to accept arguments just because they are valid. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Cross-disciplinary and comparative papers are particularly welcomed. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:10 am by Catherine Reach
Or you might have to deal with unwanted changes, such as automatic updates of dates, fields, or cross-references. [read post]