Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA" Results 5101 - 5120 of 6,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
   A decision  by the Court last year, clearing the way for unlimited spending by corporations in federal elections (Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:07 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Northern District of Florida 2010). [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:53 am by Marie Nganele
An officer may simultaneously hold more than one office in a corporation, as stated in Section 617.0840(4) of the Florida Not For Profit Corporation Act, which applies to the majority of condominium associations. [read post]
7 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
The Supreme Court put a halt to that absurd practice in its opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
Moreover, Peter Bergen and a team at the New America Foundation dug into the government’s claims about plots in America, including studying over 225 individuals recruited by al Qaeda and similar groups in the United States and charged with terrorism,  and concluded: Our review of the government’s claims about the role that NSA "bulk" surveillance of phone and email communications records has had in keeping the United States safe from… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
Fay claims that rates of drugs use over the past 40 years have fallen further in the United States than in Portugal. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States.[4]  In Dickerson, the United States Supreme Court considered the validity of a congressional statute providing that police who place a suspect in custody are not obligated to provide the now-famous “Miranda warnings. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
to be enforced within the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Now that many states like Florida have, in recent years, have rejected the duty to retreat, the “no need to retreat” rule appears to be the supermajority rule in the United States, though there is still a substantial minority of the states that adopt a duty to retreat. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:18 pm by PJ Blount
(d) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]