Search for: "United States v. California" Results 5101 - 5120 of 13,836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm by Anthony Zaller
”  The Plaintiffs in Oregon Restaurant filed a petition for review to the United State Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm by Anthony Zaller
”  The Plaintiffs in Oregon Restaurant filed a petition for review to the United State Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:17 pm by Oyez Project
United States The post This week’s oral argument audio and transcripts now available on Oyez appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht and Rachel E. Mossman
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am by Rachel Bercovitz
The United States previously deployed the so-called “mother of all bombs” against the Islamic State in the province two weeks ago. [read post]
April 25, 2017), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has joined the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and other courts in holding that athletes are not employees entitled to minimum wage and overtime time pay. [read post]
April 25, 2017), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has joined the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and other courts in holding that athletes are not employees entitled to minimum wage and overtime time pay. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, a civil procedure case involving a court’s specific jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants sued by out-of-state plaintiffs. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
Following up on a campaign pledge to end “sanctuary cities” as part of his immigration policy, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13768, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:59 pm by Lisa Ouellette
” The United States agrees with Sandoz’s interpretation in its amicus brief. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
One, the United States has the most far-reaching protections on speech of any country in the world. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, another civil procedure case involving a court’s specific jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants sued by out-of-state plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:36 pm by Jarod Bona
The issue arises from a decision by another district court decision in Northern California called In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation, 253 F.R.D. 478 (N.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:41 am by Beth Graham
” Later, the Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the case for arbitration of all of McGill’s claims based on the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]