Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 6,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2012, 8:41 pm
Failure to have health insurance coverage would result in personal tax penalties from the state. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
Overstock.com, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
“I have no choice,” Pizzi said. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Interestingly enough, Aldrich doesn’t cite any of Dahl’s work, including his 2002 book How Democratic Is the United States Constitution? [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
A recent case, Deschamps v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
The court emphasized that what the administration sought to do was unprecedented, writing, “We know of no instance — in the history of the United States — in which the government has forcibly transferred an American citizen from one foreign country to another. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 1:29 pm
United States in which the Court of International Trade decided the classification of regular webcams and better webcams used for video conferencing. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 10:20 am
During the course of the seizure the agents . . . advised the appellant that he had no choice but to provide the computer and memory card because they contained possible evidence. . . .The following Monday, OSI, realizing that they had executed an off-base search improperly, contacted United States Magistrate Judge SO to obtain a valid search authorization. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
Justice Breyer, seemingly accepting that the case was about release “into the United States,” used that phrase in his opinion and put it in italics, for emphasis. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am
Today the United States asks this court to reconsider and overrule its decision in Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 am
“Court,” “government,” “law,” “federal,” “United States” and “Congress” are all top-frequency words from Roberts’ Year End Reports. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm
In my last post, I covered some potential federalism issues raised by the Respect for Marriage Act, which seems to protect same-sex marriage in the event the Supreme Court overrules Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
" Fox v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:25 am
This is the test of Brandenburg v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
