Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am
This means understanding how the United States Sentencing Manual works alongside corresponding case precedent (e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
“There should be a clear legal recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism,” Zelenskyy said. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It observed that among the Council of Europe states there was little or no consensus on same-sex marriage, and that this was therefore a matter for the national authorities who were best placed to assess and respond to the needs of society in this field. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:56 pm
More on Concord v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:16 am
… I left that State to get the education so I to be able to fight on there playing field. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
The non-partisan Commission leveled the playing field. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
You first studied under a noted political science professor who wrote in the area of constitutional law and then early in your teaching career you were a colleague to yet another political scientist who was also a giant in that same field. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:03 am
Freeze v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm
The defendant imported various food stuffs into the United States, including pâté de foie gras from France. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
There is some precedent across the United States to support such an argument and that businesses are sustaining a “direct physical loss” by the virus. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:43 pm
Then, in Florida v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
I then cited the provision of the United States Code that imposes an obligation to register for Selective Service only upon male citizens. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:04 pm
House Bill 3073, if it becomes law, will overturn Michael v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:53 pm
In 2010, however, the United States Supreme Court ruled in New Process Steel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:24 am
Stratoflex, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
The state of the law makes that difficult today. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Our explanation of the New Deal transformation is that the public kept reelecting Franklin Roosevelt to the White House and Democrats to the Senate, so that Roosevelt was able to replace eight Justices by the time the Court decided United States v. [read post]
