Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 10,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
On Friday, the President signed a law to replace the statute struck down by the Court as overbroad in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
That resulting consumer confusion in the United States, however, falls squarely within the scope of the interests that the Lanham Act seeks to protect. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
That resulting consumer confusion in the United States, however, falls squarely within the scope of the interests that the Lanham Act seeks to protect. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am
Specifically, concerning Article 4(2)(b), the protection against disclosing a journalist’s sources had already been considered an essential component of the journalist’s freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR (Goodwin v United Kingdom). [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
But something had to be done about the United States, which is by far the largest destination of personal data from Europe. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:04 am
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm
The most important Supreme Court precedent on which lower courts have been relying in the recent rulings is United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
This very well could be an illegal stop, since the tipster was anonymous and therefore the police had no reason to believe the information the tipster provided was reliable, and since the officer has no reason independent of this anonymous tip to suspect you had committed, or were about to commit, a crime, as required under the United States Supreme Court case known as Terry v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:21 am
Plaintiffs appealed the trial court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on August 8, 2007.Finally, a few days later, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York excluded the opinion testimony of a plaintiff’s expert regarding the alleged link between the plaintiff’s ephedra use and a subsequent brain hemorrhage. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
United States, No. 1:19CV00202 (M.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:17 pm
Holocaust Memorial Museum archives)Justice TrialThere was also the 3d proceeding, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:49 am
Generally a qualified assignment company is a special purpose company, which does little more than hold an annuity or United States Treasury obligations as a "qualified funding asset" to back up the obligations it assumes from Defendants, Insurers or qualified settlement fund trustee. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm
Considering how many cert petitions the SCOTUS has to decide on at any given point in time, one may or (as I do) may not believe that an incredibly deep analysis of such questions as whether declaring code is more or less functional than other program code has occurred so far.As for the second question, I would be thoroughly surprised if the Department of Justice determined that Google's agenda in this context is in the interest of the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:29 am
Recall the history of United States v. [read post]
