Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 5101 - 5120 of 22,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The Strasbourg authorities including Dickson v United Kingdom [2008] 1 F.L.R. 1315 and Hirst v United Kingdom (2006) 42 E.H.R.R. 41 indicated that Article 8 was engaged whenever a public authority applied a policy which restricted benefits to a particular class of people such as prisoners, and it was important to remember this principle, set out in Hirst and cited in Dickson: Nor is there any place under the Convention system, where tolerance and… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Fittingly, the case on their docket that day is one of the biggest of the year: Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:12 pm
Here’s the issue that drew my attention to the “rummy name” case, People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (UK) held a referendum on whether to leave or to remain in the European Union (so called “Brexit”) with 51.9% of the people voting in favor of leaving. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm by John Floyd
The opening of our Constitution begins with the written words that, “We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice …”   The concept of justice, therefore, was the first ideal of this nation. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
  The next stop for the photographer would be the United States Supreme Court since there are First Amendment free speech and free exercise claims. [read post]
There are many individuals and groups in Michigan who lost as a result of yesterday's United States Supreme Court decision in Schuette v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
  It is empirically settled: Cantwell v Connecticut is the most influential United States Supreme Court case of all time; Branzburg v Hayes is the most well-grounded. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am by Rosalind English
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment  The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]