Search for: "Young v. State" Results 5101 - 5120 of 8,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by James Kwong
Jordan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
This charge, named after the 1981 California Supreme Court case People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
 The judge identified the average consumer as an adult buying toys for young children. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  He also proudly proclaims his identity as a democratic socialist and his esteem for Eugene V. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Given the very young age of the child and the absence of apparent prejudice arising from the failure to appoint an attorney to represent her, we discern no abuse of discretion as held in Matter of Burdick v Babcock. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:05 pm by Joel Jacobsen
") After the Supreme Court authorized Southern states to start using their police powers to enforce the color line--that was the meaning of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Supreme Court correctly determined that issues of fact exist as to whether the release signed by plaintiff on March 31, 2010, in connection with the settlement of his fee dispute with defendants, was obtained in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR § 1200.0), rule 1.8(h)(2)(see Swift v Ki Young Choe, 242 AD2d 188, 192 [1998]; see also Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm by Laura Nirider
  But here’s the twist: This new, scientifically-driven awareness of the problem of false confessions has emerged only in the decades since the United States Supreme Court last visited the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ voluntariness doctrine in 1991’s Arizona v. [read post]