Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 5121 - 5140 of 5,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2021, 8:53 am by Tim Hewson
(Family Law Act, Province of British Columbia) Part (a) is probably straightforward enough, however, if you wanted to find out if parts (b) and (c) applied to you, your child, or your parents, you may need the help of a lawyer. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[15] Material interference may be proven through several methods, such as: (i) inference from an entity’s intent to interfere, (ii) evidence that the “natural consequence” of the act or omission is interference, or (iii) evidence that the act or omission in fact interfered with a consumer’s understanding.[16] Furthermore, “it may be reasonable to presume” material interference if certain “consequential” transaction terms, such as pricing,… [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
(b) Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
Chinese authorities have invited commentaries on the 2nd Draft of the People's Republic of China Charity Undertakings Law of the PRC 中华人民共和国慈善事业法(二审草案) , which they have circulated earlier this year. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Family Court Act § 846 states in pertinent part that petitioner who has obtained a lawful order of protection of Family Court, may [162 Misc.2d 27] petition Family Court for enforcement of that order “requiring the respondent to show cause why respondent should not be dealt with in accordance with section eight hundred forty-six-a of this part” ( § 846[b]. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The bankruptcy court held that the discovery documents at issue could be disclosed to the public, because the public's interest in disclosure of these discovery documents outweighed the priests' privacy interest under Rule 26(c) and that the documents filed in court could be disclosed because they did not contain "scandalous" allegations for purposes of 11 U.S.C. 107(b). [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
He explained the situation this way: first, Enron had Directors and Officers insurance which covers legal fees when a Director or an Officer has been accused of some sort of wrongdoing. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:08 am by Chris Laughton
It goes beyond the administrators' duty to achieve the objective in paragraph 3(b) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (i.e. a better outcome than liquidation). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 6:40 am by John-Paul Boyd
Despite the efforts of MP Maurice Vellacott and his perpetually recurring Bill C-560, certainty as to the care and control of children after separation remains elusive, with, I suggest, good reason. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Schales, No. 07-10288 A child pornography case is remanded to the district court with order to vacate either the conviction for receiving child pornography in violations of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(2), or the conviction for possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(4)(B), due to violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause where: 1) possession of child pornography is a lesser included offense within receipt of child pornography; and 2) convictions on the two counts… [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:38 pm by Peter Mahler
Whenever an action is required to be taken pursuant to the terms of any Loan Documents (such as, for example, the purchase of insurance in amounts specified in such Loan Documents), no Owner may withhold, condition or delay consent or approval to such action. . . . [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:50 am by Michael H. Cohen
When physicians try to "partner" with non-physicians, they often confront challenges under the corporate practice of medicine rule. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Tax Foundation respectfully submits comment on the state tax and revenue implications of the proposed tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:27 am
Peter Mankowski: “Neues zum ‘Ausrichten’ unternehmerischer Tätigkeit unter Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c EuGVVO” - the English abstract reads as follows: “Targeted activity” in Art. 15 (1) lit. c Brussels I Regulation and in Art. 6 (1)   lit. b Rome I Regulation aims at extending consumer protection. [read post]