Search for: "Cook v. Cook"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 5,903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
The early judicial opinion in Cooke and Anr v MGN Ltd and Anr [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB) suggests that in cases involving grave imputations serious harm will be so obvious that the need for evidence can be dispensed with, such as where an individual was wrongly accused of being ‘a terrorist or a paedophile’ in a national newspaper (Mr. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Brief for Appellant, Reed v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:10 am
Wilson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:30 am
Our reports on the oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court’s May term continue with Keating v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:53 am
Good Meat Project v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
This talk focused on the efficiency and functionality of the enforcement mechanism, the judge citing the dictum of Lord Esher MR (right) in Ungar v Sugg "“... that a man had better have his patent infringed, or have anything happen to him in this world, short of losing all his family by influenza, than have a dispute about a patent". [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Austin v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm
The lukewarm reception Tim Cook got at a recent meeting of privacy activists suggests that this is increasingly understood, with more and more people refusing to be fooled into thinking that Apple is truly their ally. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Examples of both such highs and such lows reside in the recent case of Ezeb v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
" With paychecks not going out on time, it's more than remarkable that the FTC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
In a recent example of the perils of misjudged social media use Thameslink has issued an apology to Poundland after comparing its own poor service to that of Poundland cooking chocolate. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
We mentioned the British Columbia case of Lawson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
C.A.), Brooke J.A. stated: The question of when and in what circumstances the court may order such a sale was considered broadly by Grant J. in Cook v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
Problem 18 --New York Telephone Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
., Kimsey v. [read post]
