Search for: "Cook v. Cook" Results 5121 - 5140 of 5,922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 11 July 2019 Master Cook handed down judgment in the case of Osagie v Serco Ltd and Ors [2019] EWHC 1803 (QB). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
  Examples of both such highs and such lows reside in the recent case of Ezeb v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:05 am by Cody M. Poplin
The Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016 comes in response to the ongoing FBI v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
This talk focused on the efficiency and functionality of the enforcement mechanism, the judge citing the dictum of Lord Esher MR (right) in Ungar v Sugg  "“... that a man had better have his patent infringed, or have anything happen to him in this world, short of losing all his family by influenza, than have a dispute about a patent". [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm by Zachary Burdette, Quinta Jurecic
The Kremlin is cooking up a “Red Web” to control what Russian citizens can access on the internet, the Guardian tells us. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:30 am by Kirk Jenkins
Our reports on the oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court’s May term continue with Keating v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
The lukewarm reception Tim Cook got at a recent meeting of privacy activists suggests that this is increasingly understood, with more and more people refusing to be fooled into thinking that Apple is truly their ally. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The early judicial opinion in Cooke and Anr v MGN Ltd and Anr [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB) suggests that in cases involving grave imputations serious harm will be so obvious that the need for evidence can be dispensed with, such as where an individual was wrongly accused of being ‘a terrorist or a paedophile’ in a national newspaper (Mr. [read post]