Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 5121 - 5140 of 25,702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While the days of the Puritans are long behind us, the jeremiad remains a strong and flexible staple of American political discourse. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit—the decisions of which are binding on the University of California—has expressly recognized that expression "related to [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
On June 5, the United States filed a motion seeking an order to seal the criminal complaint for thirty days. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 11:25 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The CWA defines the term “navigable waters” to mean “waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm by Margo Schlanger
Both parties, and the United States as an amicus, agreed in this case that these provisions allow courts the ability to dismiss such suits without prejudice. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Jason Mazzone
Read with modern spectacles Jacobson looks extraordinarily deferential to the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by Ilya Somin
Here is an excerpt: Section 212(f) [of the Immigration and Nationality Act]… gives the president the power to bar entry into the U.S. by any foreign national whom he deems to be "detrimental to the interests of the United States…" The Trump administration claimed – and the Supreme Court, in Trump v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 10:45 am by Thomas Key
Last week, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals clarified the rule for treating several works as a "single unit of publication" for registration purposes in Unicolors, Inc. v. [read post]