Search for: "Doe 35" Results 5121 - 5140 of 17,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2007, 12:18 am
Instead, under Adams Fruit, the PTO is entitled no deference, since Section 2(b)(2) of title 35 does not vest the PTO with any substantive rulemaking power.On the issue of retroactivity:Here, GSK made a clever move: instead of arguing that rights in patent applications were threatened, GSK argued that rights in trade secrets were threatened, since these potential secrets were sacrificed in the act of filing a patent application (this was also argued in the AIPLA amicus brief). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:07 am by emagraken
Doe) the Plaintiff suffered psychological injuries in a serious collision in which the offending motorist died. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:08 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
My own experience -- and I'm the sort of guy who regularly looks up into the sky -- was that I haven't seen anything remarkable up there for weeks since the last F-35 test flights. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 9:07 am by Dan Flynn
The Idaho Department of Agriculture claims it never found any mold and does not know the source of FDA’s information. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
"This year, juveniles account for 7 percent of overall arrests in the city -- but about 45 percent of all arrests for robbery and carjacking, and 35 percent of burglary arrests" according to D.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:23 pm
Details: 35 USC 102(f) states: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - ***** (f) he did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:51 am
This number does reflect an increase from the 48 percent of backseat seatbelt wearers in the year 2010. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:11 pm
The crash report also does not say why Ellis was unable to stop before hitting the vehicle in front of him. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Regardless of efficiency or workload concerns, the PTO’s rulemaking authority “does not include a power to revise clear statutory terms. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 7:11 pm
So, as a credit card commercial might state: $35 for a training session $41 for a mic not a lot for an couple hours of my time to create something I would have to teach 100 people = Priceless [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:23 pm by Alfred Brophy
 As I said, the New York Times filled the space that abovethelaw now does of policing law schools. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 6:56 am
A three-cent tax increase would generate $30 billion, while a 10-cent tax increase could result in $100 billion in new revenue (Budoff Brown/Rogers, Politico, 7/9); and* Requiring that not-for-profit hospitals provide a minimum amount of charity care, which would both increase the amount of care provided that the federal government does not fund and force those hospitals not providing enough no-cost care out of tax-exempt status (Martinez, Wall Street Journal, 7/10); [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:42 pm
O Beloved Law Blog readers, where does Big Law go from here? [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:07 pm by Karen Hoffmann
” Her publications include: Litigating Reproductive Health Rights In The Inter- American System: What Does A Winning Case Look Like? [read post]