Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 137,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
John Doe, 13-cv-14458; Magistrate Andrea Simonton recommended to sanction Lipscomb in Malibu Media v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
And I can see that those who would like Apple to "destroy" (as Steve Jobs put it) Android in court (for which Apple's own customers would also pay the price) increasingly realize that Apple does not appear to be, if the results of more than four years of litigation are any indication, a nuclear world power.I did want to add a few general thoughts. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 10:32 am
Cir. 2019) (discussing the court’s prior reversal of a jury DOE verdict) Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:00 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 11:14 am
US (opinion) and Oregon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:04 am
In Suh v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument on April 28, 2010 in the case of Doe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
In an unusual move, a Wisconsin federal district court in Doe 16 v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:55 am
On March 23, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its earlier January opinion in Doe v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:36 am
In Blueford v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 7:00 pm
That is the lesson of the unanimous Supreme Court case Skinner v. [read post]
Agency’s enforcing its rule prohibiting misconduct does not require that it show “employee’s intent”
11 Mar 2010, 3:17 am
Agency’s enforcing its rule prohibiting misconduct does not require that it show “employee’s intent”Matter of Daveiga v City of New York, 57 AD3d 451The New York City Housing Authority dismissed Kymel Daveiga from his position as Supervisor of Grounds after he was found to have violated the Authority’s policy prohibiting employees from "commit[ting] any . . . violation of the law either on or off duty or on or off the work site implicating their… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s Majority Decision in Sveen v Melin The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the retroactive application of Minnesota’s statute does not violate the Contracts Clause. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:04 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:46 pm
" It does not have "much of a future. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:51 pm
The Conglomerate is hosting an interesting blog symposium about Jones v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:15 pm
It has become difficult to understand why the Federal Circuit does what it does in any number of rulings, but its decisions relating to patent eligibility have set patent law back several generations, turned precedent on its head, ignored the Patent Act passed by Congress, and unnecessarily and inexplicably expanded upon bad Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:01 am
A mere technical error in an arrest warrant does not void the warrant. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:07 am
Get an attorney who does to equalize things. [read post]
