Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 11,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2020, 12:45 pm
Analysis and comparator Eagle eyes will no doubt spot that there is no (current) circumstance in which the Welsh tenant can receive a lesser notice than his English counterpart. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:33 am
The juror who struggles with English. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
A two-week English course doesn’t turn a foreigner into an English-speaking American. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
2 VCG and its affiliates have been represented by McCarter & English in at least one other Trust-related matter. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
2 VCG and its affiliates have been represented by McCarter & English in at least one other Trust-related matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:20 am
Huawei and ZTE v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
In Abou-Haidar, v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
Like its English counterpart, the Judge considered that the Scottish common law right should be interpreted and developed in ways which reflect the values underlying ECHR rights [113-114, 126]. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Although the Court in Day v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
R. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:36 pm
Raja TransportIndian Oil Corporation v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 4:01 pm
explains the limitations of the allegedly pro-parfumier ruling against smell-alike scents in L'Oreal v Bellure (see blogs here and here), and there is even a delicious photo of a bunch trade mark enthusiasts enjoying themselves at the roulette table (surely not with their clients' money, speculates Merpel ...)Full contents and details of Trademark World hereMore on LG Philips v TatungA couple of things, in fact, arising from the IPKat's post on the recent Court of… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:55 pm
The arguments to the contrary required torturing not only constitutional law but the English language. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 1:47 pm
By Eric Goldman Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:28 am
PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
