Search for: "GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY "
Results 5121 - 5140
of 6,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 10:27 am
., a crane, a hoist) from an affiliated rental company, how much of the rental fee should qualify as a cost of the Work? [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
., a crane, a hoist) from an affiliated rental company, how much of the rental fee should qualify as a cost of the Work? [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
., a crane, a hoist) from an affiliated rental company, how much of the rental fee should qualify as a cost of the Work? [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:58 am
(site: Bruce Nuclear Generating Station A) #032 Hydrazine samples in boiler/feedwater effluent during transient/shutdown of 316.1 mg/L exceeded 200 mg/L limit in company CofA. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
(Patently-O) Ninth Circuit affirms infringement finding against clothing maker: Quiksilver, Inc. v Kymsta Corp (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB affirms refusal to register, ruling DELI EXPRESS and SAN LUIS depicted ‘in such a manner that consumers would not perceive them as constituting a single composite mark’: In re E A Sween Company (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB: Extreme rareness of RENATI as surname leads to 2(e)(4) reversal: In re The House of Terrance Proprietary… [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 11:49 pm
One of the companies that lost power was the plaintiff insurance company. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:13 am
See this Bank of America letter and this Verizon letter issued recently under (i)(7) - and this General Electric letter issued under (i)(2). [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:42 am
General Electric General Electric Co. sends about $3 million a year in routine legal work to its Indian affiliate, said Janine Dascenzo, the Fairfield, Connecticut-based company's managing counsel for legal operations. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
General Electric Co., 61 Cal.App.4th 830 (Cal. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:21 am
If the respondent defaults in appearance the record is limited to the complainant’s submission, although it may be enlarged by an investigation undertaken by the Panel as was the case in General Electric Company v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
Cooper Electric Supply Co., 940 F.2d 896, 905 (3d Cir.1991), the Third Circuit reasoned that sales promotion “consists of marketing activity aimed at promoting (i.e., increasing, developing, facilitating, and/or maintaining) customer sales generally. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Avery Dennison Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Juniper – Juniper appeals dismissal of declaratory judgment complaint based on lack of personal jurisdiction: Juniper Networks v SSL Service (PATracer) Lincoln Electric Company - ALJ Rogers denies motion to preclude respondents, ESAB and Sidergas, from relying on prior art not produced in certain bulk welding wire containers (337-TA-686) (ITC Law Blog) Litepanels - Litepanels asserts film production LED lighting patents against… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:28 pm
The project demonstrates collaboration between utility companies and customers. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:01 am
France also has on the table a proposal to permit people to delete digital information about themselves, an idea that would generate outrageous results if applied to the non-digital world. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:02 am
Chinese-based companies like Knauf gladly filled the void, and it sent drywall the company eventually knew was faulty. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:33 am
The technology and car companies say that safety remains a priority. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:09 am
American analysts generally are less equivocal than American officials. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:09 am
American analysts generally are less equivocal than American officials. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
The company blamed the pollution on storm damage that eventually resulted in a fire. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 5:30 pm
Other exemptions include prospective employees of armored car companies and other people who would be handling cash and securities, prospective employees of drug companies who would be handling controlled substances, or an employee who is suspected of damaging company property. [read post]
