Search for: "German v. German"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 5,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2007, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Cord v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Union itself is a fund manager and member of a cooperative of financial institutions, consisting almost entirely of banks (see here, in German) and two of its main shareholders are banks, namely DZ Bank AG and WGZ Bank AG. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 12:08 pm
I think the Cadence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Famous Trials 1 v. (193?) [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:19 pm
STL recently highlighted a German-language trademark law blog and a French-language trademark law blog that English readers can now access through the wonders of Google and Yahoo! [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 9:50 pm
Since the landmark 1980 case of Filártiga v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:20 am
The England v Kenya cricket game is about to begin. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:25 am
The RIAA is insisting on deposing Tanya Andersen's 10-year-old daughter in Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
Spillars regarding Viereck v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:49 am
This ruling is in French and German only, so if you'd like to read something easier just try reading the IPKat's thoughts on the lack of translations into other languages ...* Case T-364/05 Saint-Gobain Pam v OHIM, Propamsa. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 3:32 am
The Court of Appeals also found that the information in the notes was pathologically germane. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
The case is C-524/04 Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:09 am
Intel Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 8:43 am
Paladuk:Summons in Warner v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
"The case, Arminius Schleifmittel GmbH v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
In my view, however, while a germane piece of information, not to mention something intrinsically interesting, that's far too simplistic to take us very far towards actual enlightened understanding of this phenomenon. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
Petition to the FDA to Ban Third Generation Oral Contraceptives Containing Desogestrel due to Increased Risk of Venous Thrombosis (HRG Publication #1799)February 6, 2007Andrew Von Eschenbach, M.D., CommissionerU.S. [read post]
