Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 5121 - 5140 of 36,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
The IPKat has read with interest Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe v Asda, a malicious falsehood case.Ajinomoto is the manufacturer of the artificial sweetener, aspartame. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 2:38 am
467/08, Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE), a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Spain). [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
We are pleased to welcome fellow blogger and attorney Charley Foster from Planet Kauai in a discussion of State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In this instance, perhaps because the patent expired in 2022 and therefore the harm was for a relatively short period, Marcus Smith J held that the harm could be quantified in damages. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
SIDES Opinion of the Court – 3 – deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness” and “ha[d] been experiencing worsening depression and increased thoughts of self-harm. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
It sounds true that many claimants would struggle to prove factual harm to reputation at trial, but of the 50-odd cases which have mentioned section 1, I think only three resulted in the defendant winning at trial on “serious harm” (Cooke v MGN [2015] 1 WLR 895; Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing [2016] EMLR 12; Umeyor v Ibe [2016] EWHC 862 (QB). [read post]