Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 5121 - 5140 of 7,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
The House-passed version of the law made some significant changes from pre-Foster law, but those went by the wayside:  the Senate decided to simply re-enact the law as it existed before Foster, doing nothing more than renumbering the provision from (E)(4) to (C)(4) under RC 2929.14. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by David Rodman
A director is considered independent under NYSE Rule303A.02(b)(ii) if the director received less than $120,000 in direct compensation, other than director’s fees, in any one year period over the last three years. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Michael C. Smith
"Plaintiff has proposed that, prior to discussing limits on e-discovery, Plaintiff be allowed Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of Defendants to identify custodians. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by Law Lady
BBT, LLC (212 & 311); CLAUDE BROUSSEAU & ANN MARIE DUGRE (303); E & N, INC. (103); JOSEPH FERRARO (211); RICHARD & JANE KISEL (205); LEONARD MARNELL (207); JAR ENTERPRISES, LLC (105 & 108); L. [read post]
For one of the few decisions analyzing this issue, see In re French, Case No. 06-20066 (Bankr. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:44 pm by admin
(E-1) or that she has invested a “substantial” amount in a U.S. enterprise. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Michael C. Smith
  In this case, the parties proposed the following agreed language re: document discovery be included as section 2.B. of the Court's discovery order: consistent with the framework set forth in the Federal Circuit’s Model Order onE-Discovery in Patent Cases, on or by February 29, 2012 the parties shall meetand confer regarding the scope of additional documents to be produced relating tothe issues addressed in the Patent Rules (i.e.,… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Section 9.10(2)(e) states: (e) An individual signature on a petition sheet may not be counted if: 1. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
  (Section 21-2-5 also has subsections (d) & (e), but they're not relevant here.) [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:07 pm by Sixth Sense Law
Second, let’s go back to the future by re-visiting a 2011 Sixth Sense Law post concerning the liability of web hosting companies for copyright violations. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
” The State’s position in In re M.M. is more puzzling. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:45 am by Michael Feit
BGE 120 II 35 E. 4a S. 40 f.; 114 II 159 E. 2c S. 163; 107 II 216 E. 3a und b S. 318 f.). [read post]