Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 5121 - 5140 of 6,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2011, 3:17 pm
Given the disastrous economy of the last several years, and its devastating affect on legal hiring, I'm glad that H.R. 1113 makes this serious issue a matter of public discussion and censure. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 6:29 am by Gregory Forman
Because an itemized statement of the time an attorney has spent on the matter is a required element in the award of attorney’s fees, a party seeking attorneys fees implicitly waives the right to treat his or her attorney’s itemized statement of time as privileged materials. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm by Kim Zetter
“This is the first official ask from the subcommittee [in this matter], said committee spokesman Josh Holly. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:07 am by Chip Merlin
The statement was ignorant and completely wrong.As a matter of fact, the independent and company adjuster community outnumbered public adjusters by four to one. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:24 am by Steve Hall
“No matter what we do, we cannot ease the pain of family members who lose someone to terrible violence. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Chad W. Johnson
However, as a matter of first impression, the court held that American Family “had a duty to promptly and effectively communicate with anyone it was reasonably aware had or legitimately needed information pertaining to the handling of plaintiffs’ claim” (e.g., subcontractors performing the work). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:39 am by PaulKostro
“Expert testimony is required in cases of professional malpractice where the matter to be addressed is so esoteric that the average juror could not form a valid judgment as to whether the conduct of the professional was reasonable. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 4:44 am
It would take a fundamental error on the part of the trial judge to be reversed on a factual matter. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
US, one of the most wretched 4th Amendment decisions ever handed down, the Supreme Court held that the subjective intent of an officer did not matter:  even if the traffic stop was a pretext for searching for drugs or guns or whatever, as long as there was an objective basis for the stop — a traffic violation — it was valid. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:59 am
N-60 has a demonstrated benefit when measured by the statistic that truly matters - improved public health. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm by Paul A. Prados
Before doing so the Judge granted the nonsuit and left the matter of sanctions open. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm by cdw
Matter referred, however, to the disciplinary committee for investigation, and if necessary, appropriate disciplinary action. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Just last month, in The Problem with Income Tax Vehicle Credits, I criticized the failure of Congress to provide the IRS with sufficient funding to administer the dozens of tax credits enacted by the Congress to deal with matters under the jurisdiction of other executive departments and agencies.Several years ago, in Taxing High-Income Individuals, I advocated, among other things, a way to reduce the federal deficit without raising tax rates. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:02 pm by Ashby Jones
(AP Photo/Isaac Brekken, File) Sometimes the world of sports tees up good LB topics even if the facts at hand don’t concern criminal offenses, civil suits or, for that matter, the court system at all. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:19 pm by Rosenbaum & Associates
To make matters worse, all of those prescriptions were off-label, which means the drug was never approved to control dementia patients -- it was only ever approved for use in psychotic patients. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
By a vote of eight to one, the Court held that the First Amendment shields from tort liability individuals who stage a peaceful protest on a matter of public concern near the funeral of a military service member. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by emagraken
Strang ought not to be considered to have waived solicitor-client privilege over anything more than the matters he spoke directly about. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:40 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Given that Westboro’s speech was at a public place on a matter of public concern, that speech is entitled to “special protection” under the First Amendment. [read post]