Search for: "In re Bush"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 6,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
"If the president is re-elected, then this law will go forward," he said. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:35 pm
"Nobody wants to say they're for sex offenders," Langford said. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:31 am
The re-arrest took place after Babu had informed his supporters online of the police’s plan to re-arrest him. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:04 am
"If the president is re-elected, then this law will go forward," he said. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:13 pm
It's not a good move if they're not. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 12:24 pm
You're quite a horrible individual. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 5:55 am
And, like I said in point #1, if they're going to re-open the deal anyway....... [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Bush had done. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:17 am
Early in his administration he would say “we’re in two wars. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:00 pm
Bush on cybersecurity. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:42 am
"I posited that this presumably reflected not only continuation of the Bush tax cuts, but more particularly the continuing economic slowdown. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:36 pm
” In re Marriage of Knoll, 2016 IL App (1st) 152494, ¶ 50, 65 N.E.3d 878. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:33 am
For instance, some bills, such as the Bush tax cuts of 2001, are designed to raise or lower federal revenue, with little modification to the underlying structure of the tax system. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:54 am
(It came on the heels of a Bush administration decision to permit an earlier pipeline from those tar sands deposits through North Dakota to Oklahoma). [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
(Note: Bush v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
Oregon (2006), the liberal Justices and Kennedy invoked the doctrine to deny Chevron deference to the Bush Justice Department’s interpretation of the Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 4:58 am
"Nobody wants to say they're for sex offenders," Langford said. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 4:52 am
Bush; Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who you might remember as the three names running the CBO a while back, and Peter J. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
They're only going to cover your skin. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm
Bush issued a directive essentially rescinding the regs and acknowledging that the gag rule violated medical ethics, an action made official in 1993. [read post]
