Search for: "J. C."
Results 5121 - 5140
of 19,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 1:44 pm
The county court trial divisions presiding over misdemeanor DUI and DWAI cases are as follows: Division C, Judge Burback; Division E, Judge Carpenter; Division B, Judge Fisch; Division F, Judge Moore; Division G, Judge Randall; Division D, Judge Sargent; Division A, Judge Stuart; Division H, Judge Vance; Division J, Judge Woodford. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am
Manafort, Trump’s campaign manager; Roger J. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:53 am
Just like Melania asserting her independence from the unyielding figure of Donald J. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:03 am
Schwenkel, and Steven J. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:48 am
However he did not agree with Arnold J that it is necessary to determine whether the product embodies the inventive advance of the patent, which is referred to in the CJEU’s decision in Actavis v Sanofi (C-443/12), noting that the Actavis case was only concerned with Article 3(c), not 3(a) and commenting that he had difficulty in understanding the difference between the “core inventive advance” and the invention disclosed by the claims. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
This means that the receiving Office (RO) ascertains whether the failure to file the international application within the priority period- occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken ("due care" criterion), or- was unintentional ("unintentional" criterion).Rule 49ter.1 PCT foresees in its paragraph (a) that, where the RO has restored a right of priority under the "due care" criterion, that restoration must, subject to its paragraph… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
This means that the receiving Office (RO) ascertains whether the failure to file the international application within the priority period- occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken ("due care" criterion), or- was unintentional ("unintentional" criterion).Rule 49ter.1 PCT foresees in its paragraph (a) that, where the RO has restored a right of priority under the "due care" criterion, that restoration must, subject to its paragraph… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
§ 7261(c), how can it conduct certain harmless error analysis without making factual findings? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
By now, most Lawfare readers will be aware of the issues before the Supreme Court in Jesner v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:05 am
The background to the case was summarized by the AmeriKat's friend Steve Baldwin in this post here last January and the full decision of Arnold J can be read here. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm
David J. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:00 am
Timothy J. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:00 am
Timothy J. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
Yankauskas and Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 2015-C-1866 (C.P. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Congratulations to Edward J. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
(A lovely tribute by his former clerk Heather Gerken can be found here, and one by his former clerk and fellow Verdict co-columnist Michael C. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 12:27 pm
Source: Nobles, C. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:23 am
., No. 16 C 5387, Slip Op. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:23 am
., No. 16 C 5387, Slip Op. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:22 am
Rumpf and Assemblywoman DiAnne C. [read post]
