Search for: "Label v Label" Results 5121 - 5140 of 13,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2015, 1:17 pm
Department of Agriculture’s meat country-of-origin labeling requirements in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Constitutional Criminal Procedure In her book, Kwall discusses the American constitutional case of Dickerson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:16 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The school defendants tried to argue semantics around the label ascribed to the discipline imposed on the plaintiff (expulsion versus withdrawal) but this does not sway the court. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
 This was the evidence of one Dr Greg Bacon, who had been a sales representative of the defendants, but who had been sacked for promoting off-label sales. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 12:30 pm by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/xVzu8DNi4B -> Liability for P2P file sharing discussed in Dallas Buyers Club v iiNet (No 4) [2015] FCA 838 (14 August 2015) http://t.co/GwnTNixDLk -> Instagram Food Porn Violates Copyright Law Says German Court http://t.co/zTBd1MTfPM -> When mi casa is not su casa – Queensland Supreme Court orders creative remedies for copyright http://t.co/Bt6kLVqiSh -> All Android operating systems infringe Java API packages, Oracle says http://t.co/vHeAZIs6dA -> Federal… [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:14 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court, however, affirmed summary judgment as to her state law retaliation claim based on the filing of a workers’ comp claim, where the company did not provide her worker’s comp coverage and there was no evidence that the staffing agency acted with a retaliatory motive (Burton v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:40 pm
  While Buffalo Bill from "Silence of the Lambs" may not be who most would think about when reading Franz v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:18 am by Lisa Baird
The Southern District of New York’s preliminary injunction in Amarin Pharm, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]