Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 5121 - 5140 of 21,104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2019, 11:12 am by Steven Cohen
  The plaintiff claims that the defendant should be held liable for negligent care of the plaintiff Debra Chestnut. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:46 am by Attorney Neil Z. Burns
  Under this standard, you need only prove that the defendant owned the animal that injured you. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:07 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
The court was not persuaded by the defendants’ argument that they could not be held liable for the plaintiff’s harm because there was no evidence regarding the precise time when her injury occurred. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 12:36 pm by Renae Lloyd
The Plaintiffs (the estate of a decedent and the decedent’s ex-wife), reportedly allege that Ameriprise, Peggs and several other defendants “failed to carry out the decedent’s intentions regarding beneficiary designations for two annuities. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 11:34 am by Nassiri Law
Evidence presented in that case showed defendant put his hands on plaintiff’s throat, pushed her chair into a wall, resulting in her banging her head. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Unknown
The Fulgenzis have learned that beginning in 2020 they will be liable for a state parking tax on the parking lot revenue that they collect. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:28 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Courts in Florida have held that third-party claimants can hold an insurer liable for excess damages against the policyholder if an insurer breaches its duty of good faith to that policyholder, including a duty to defend. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Victoria struck out elements of the defendants defence. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:30 am by Attorney Neil Z. Burns
Further, a trucking company will be held vicariously liable for the negligent conduct of its driver. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs contend that the special relationship arose from an interaction with defendant in which they relied on defendants expertise as to coverage. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
 PatentsFollowing the Munich Regional Court's decision a few months ago to issue an (ex parte) injunction ordering the defendant to withdraw an anti-suit injunction filed in a US court (an thus an anti-anti-suit injunction), the Paris Court was asked to issue a similar injunction, ultimately granting an anti-anti-suit injunction in IPCom v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:47 pm by Jesse Lamp
However, the defendants took no action to remedy the problems nor did they reply to Francis’s complaints. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:27 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The Court of Appeals rejected these arguments, finding that the president’s “personal knowledge of who [defendant] employed could be reasonably inferred based on his position as president of the company. [read post]