Search for: "MATTER OF A R" Results 5121 - 5140 of 114,123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The ECtHR reiterates: ‘que, si tout individu qui s’engage dans un débat public d’intérêt général est tenu de ne pas dépasser certaines limites notamment quant au respect de la réputation et des droits d’autrui, il lui est permis de recourir à une certaine dose d’exagération, voire de provocation, c’est-à-dire d’être quelque peu immodéré dans… [read post]
As the DPC explained, the purpose of discovery is to give litigating parties access to information necessary to the matter before the court. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
As I reported last year, the SEC finally made some long overdue reforms that limit who can make proposals but do not change the subject matters to which proposals can be addressed: Amend the criteria... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 9:22 am by Christopher Hoffmann
Taking the matter into your own hands and handling the case out of court might seem like a simple option. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:26 am by Paul M. Adkins
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:24 am by Victoria Gallegos
  Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) Policy Director, Integrated Harm Reduction, R Street The R Street Institute—a free-market think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C., and with regional offices across the country—seeks a skilled Policy Director to develop and oversee a major new program on integrated harm reduction. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:06 am by David Bernstein
., that your racial ancestry 'matters' in some concrete way, a view generally considered racist) why these cases are different. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
I can imagine what the reader might think when reading these few lines: another text on artificial intelligence (“AI”) and the Patent Law! [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
All that mattered was whether the Tennessee court, notwithstanding its substantial "latitude to reasonably determine that a defendant has not [shown prejudice]," still managed to blunder so badly that every fairminded jurist would disagree. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
  In some instances these issues touch on matters that have significant relevance to political and legal theory generally, and for this reason alone are worth reading. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This certification, as I understand it, would give the Florida Supreme Court discretionary jurisdiction to consider the matter, should the Swartzes decide to seek review by the Florida Supreme Court; but if the parties don't seek such review, then the Jackmans are entitled to the injunction. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 2:14 am
., a Duke University economics professor and reparations expert, told the website Cal Matters that no single state could launch an action large enough to be called “reparations. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 1:11 am by Rose Hughes
Given the legal uncertainty generated by the referral, the EPO could be commended for attempting to deal with the matter swiftly. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 10:48 pm by Jeff Richardson
  The service makes it easy to create and manage virtual sub-accounts for each of your matters with no limit to the number of client matters. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 10:31 pm by Mark Summerfield
Since April last year, IP Australia has provided a streamlined process under which most deadlines associated with Australian patent, trade marks, and design rights – including evidence deadlines in opposition matters – could be extended by up to three months, at no charge, if the extension is required ‘due to the disruptive effects of the COVID-19 pandemic’. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 10:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
With regards to the Plaintiff’s objection that the investigating State Trooper allegedly violated the hearsay rule by referring to a statement that he obtained from a non-testifying witness, the court found that the Trooper’s reference to this statement was permitted to explain his course of conduct in the investigation, rather than any admission of hearsay statement for the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]