Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 5121 - 5140 of 6,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 3:19 am
The IPKat thanks fellow IP blogger and enthusiast Martin Husovec (who got there first) for drawing this decision to his attention. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"In Lopresti v Bamundo, Zwal & Schermerhorn, LLP;  2010 NY Slip Op 33436(U);  December 14, 2010;  Sup Ct, NY County ;  Docket Number: 100206/09;  Judge: Martin Shulman determines that equitable estoppel does not apply. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  InLopresti v Bamundo, Zwal & Schermerhorn, LLP, ;2010 NY Slip Op 33436(U); December 14, 2010; Judge: Martin Shulman we see a familiar problem. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Erik Gerding
It is hard to say anything detailed about a suit that has not been filed yet, but this type of suit could have even broader implications that this summer's SEC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:46 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Whether his faith cost him the job and whether certain religious beliefs may legally render people unfit for certain jobs are among the questions raised by the case, Gaskell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 9:18 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Two motions to dismiss were filed in Martin v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Kali Borkoski
  Judges Merritt and Martin posit that the Court “has now decided that the phrase ‘any other provision of law’ has a meaning exactly opposite to the ordinary meaning of the words” At the National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports on Monday’s decision in Costco v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Supreme Court recently handed down a unanimous 8–0 decision by Justice Ginsburg in Abbott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:05 pm by Hopkins
Well, Big Tobacco finally received their first answer in the higher courts; from the 1st District Court of Appeals in Florida; in the case of Martin v RJ Reynolds. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:05 pm by Hopkins
Well, Big Tobacco finally received their first answer in the higher courts; from the 1st District Court of Appeals in Florida; in the case of Martin v RJ Reynolds. [read post]