Search for: "Matthews v. Matthews" Results 5121 - 5140 of 5,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
Jacobsen received a letter demanding the licence fee payments from a company named Kamind Associates, owned by Matthew Katzer, which has obtained software patents over model rail road software (particularly U.S. patent 7,216,836). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
  On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
Jake Brigance (Time to Kill) v. 3. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
What is true is that the settlement of a federal lawsuit, Pottinger v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
Mark Niles, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Washington College of Law "Integrated teaching" -- Sometimes involves co-teaching, e.g. property + civil procedure profs collaborating on teaching Matthews v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:01 pm
When we finished reading the majority opinion in Kovach v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:01 pm
An example of its enforcement is the 1994 Pennsylvania Superior Court case, Savoy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
  When the Delaware Supreme Court held that friendship with an interested party could result in the loss of independence in Brehm v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:18 am
Back in March, the IPKat wrote:"If you search the Scottish Courts website under "intellectual property" you won't find this -- which is why the IPKat missed it on his prowl -- but Wise Property Care Limited v White Thomson Preservation Limited and others [2008] CSOH 46, a passing-off decision of Lord Matthews (Outer House in the Court of Session), was posted on the Scottish Court website this morning. ... [read post]