Search for: "People v Justice A." Results 5121 - 5140 of 23,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Ferdinand v Mgn Ltd (Rev 2) [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) – Read judgment In the first “misuse of private information” trial against a newspaper since Max Mosley in 2008, Mr Justice Nicol dismissed a claim brough by England and Manchester United footballer Rio Ferdinand against the “Sunday Mirror”. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:12 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
 In People v Buie, the Michigan Supreme Court held that expert testimony by two-way video did not violate the defendant’s right of confrontation because the defendant’s counsel waived that right. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:55 am by David Oscar Markus
That he wants O’Connor to vote to strike down Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Serious harm Relying on Mr Justice Dingemans’ comments at paragraph 47 of Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA [2016] EWHC 66 (QB), it was submitted on behalf of Mr Singh that an allegation of sexual assault to senior management against a clinical member of staff at a hospital dealing with highly vulnerable patients is so obviously serious, that evidence is not even necessary, notwithstanding that publication was made only to two people. [read post]
However, as Justice Kavanaugh noted, the US House recently passed a bill that would create an official path to citizenship for people in the US on TPS. [read post]
13 May 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Thankfully, he also sued Google Inc for the publication of search results for his name, and not just Google Australia, since the latter claim was, as His Honour Justice Dixon concluded – hopeless ([2017] VSC 158). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by Scott Bomboy
” As Roosevelt started his second term, he used one of his fireside chats in March 1937 to make his case to the American people for adding more Justices to the Supreme Court who agreed with him. [read post]