Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 5121 - 5140 of 7,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved Judge Lynn Griffin dismissed an appeal in Peter Beswick v Information Commissioner [2022] UKFTT 360 (GRC). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
On 7 November 2011, 18:30: “The Limits of Investigative Journalism” Peter Preston, LSE. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
There is probably much I have missed, but the sketch above is a beginning. [1] Peter H. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am by Sophie Britton (Bristows)
The panel was chaired by Peter Damerell (Powell Gilbert), who was joined by Clemens-August Heusch (Head of Global Litigation and Disputes, Nokia) and Kevin Duan (Han Kun Law Offices). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:The European antitrust raids on Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Glaxo, Sanofi-Aventis: (IP Law360), (Wall Street Journal Health Blog), (IAM), (IPEG), (SmartBrief), (In the pipeline),Hasbro and Mattel alleged trade mark infringement and demand shut down of Scrabulous, a free online gaming site allowing users to play a version of Scrabble:… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
’ (Ars Technica) (Excess Copyright) (Techdirt) Report on Digital Music Forum East – ISP liability for copyright infringement (Media Wonk) (Media Wonk) Public Knowledge testifies to Congress on cable and satellite copyright (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D Illinois: Website not sufficient to create personal jurisdiction: Richter v INSTAR Enterprises (Chicago Intellectual Property Law… [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Peter Jaszi: mentioned questions in Salinger cases about whether being made available in archives ought to count as available to public. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:37 am
Seller, Not Foreign Manufacturer, Owns Trademark, TTAB RulesConcurrent Use:Precedential No. 29: TTAB Dissolves Concurrent Use Proceeding, Plaintiff Fails to Prove Prior UseDiscovery/Evidence/Procedure: Eighth Circuit Directs District Court to Apply Preclusion in B&B v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 8:21 am by Larry
Supreme Court decision called Riley v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
 One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]