Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 5121 - 5140 of 11,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
However, further citing precedent, the court  clarified that “[W]here a claim for injunctive relief is moot, relief in the form of damages for a past constitutional violation is not affected. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
However, further citing precedent, the court  clarified that “[W]here a claim for injunctive relief is moot, relief in the form of damages for a past constitutional violation is not affected. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
On cert., State Farm presents two questions that have divided the circuits: (1) “[w]hat standard governs the decision whether to dismiss a relator’s claim for violation of the FCA’s seal requirement”; and (2) “[w]hether and under what standard a corporation” “may be deemed to have ‘knowingly’ presented a false claim” in violation of the FCA “based on the purported collective or imputed ill intent of… [read post]
EU member states were also encouraged to construct national citizens’ panels to collect individual nations’ inputs on conference discussions. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 8:33 am by Juan Antunez
So it's not surprising I found a recent article by law professor Gerry W. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:25 pm by Pamela
Tax Records Supporting documents, such as 1099’s, W-2’s, receipts for charitable contributions, etc. should be kept for 3 years after the return was filed or the due date, whichever is later. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
Hilton hired two former Starwood executives who allegedly stole over 100,000 documents belonging to Starwook outlining many of Starwood's key marketing plans and ideas for liefstyle chains such as W. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:51 am
Coleman told the court "it may happen in half of the cases, where an individual is arrested, magistrated, released, and no official charges are ever brought. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 7:00 am by Ryan Gibson
What's Covered The seminars reviewed the Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and also some of the ACA's impacts which have already been felt by group health plans and employers, such as the requirement to cover children through age 26. [read post]